On Thu, 2018-08-30 at 11:07 +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> 
> I do not think so since for nfrags we have:
> nfrags = 1 + skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
> nfrags += 1 + skb_shinfo(head)->nr_frags;
> 
> and even if frag_tail is NULL we will have nfrags = 2.
> 
> Agree?

Yeah, I misread those two lines.

johannes

Reply via email to