Tony Chuang <[email protected]> writes:

>> > +  pkt_info->bmc = bmc;
>> > +  pkt_info->sec_type = sec_type;
>> > +  pkt_info->tx_pkt_size = skb->len;
>> > +  pkt_info->offset = chip->tx_pkt_desc_sz;
>> > +  pkt_info->qsel = skb->priority;
>> 
>> Shouldn't be qsel somehow mapped from skb->priority ?
>
> Firmware handles it.

What if meaning of skb->priority changes in the future? I don't think
it's safe to provide kernel internal values to firmware, you should do
some kind of mapping in the driver.

-- 
Kalle Valo

Reply via email to