On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 03:32:11PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Tony Chuang <[email protected]> writes: > > >> > + pkt_info->bmc = bmc; > >> > + pkt_info->sec_type = sec_type; > >> > + pkt_info->tx_pkt_size = skb->len; > >> > + pkt_info->offset = chip->tx_pkt_desc_sz; > >> > + pkt_info->qsel = skb->priority; > >> > >> Shouldn't be qsel somehow mapped from skb->priority ? > > > > Firmware handles it. > > What if meaning of skb->priority changes in the future? I don't think > it's safe to provide kernel internal values to firmware, you should do > some kind of mapping in the driver.
We already have some functions that do mapping: rtw_hw_queue_mapping(struct sk_buff *skb) and rtw_pci_get_tx_qsel(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 queue) Preasumly they should be used here as well. Thanks Stanislaw
