case 1:
} else if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5390) ||
rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5392)) {
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG0, 0x00000404);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG1, 0x00080606);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG2, 0x00000000);
} else if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5592)) {
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG0, 0x00000404);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG1, 0x00000000);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG2, 0x00000000);
} else if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5350)) {
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG0, 0x00000404);
} else if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT6352)) {
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, MIMO_PS_CFG, 0x00000002);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_PIN_CFG, 0x00150F0F);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_ALC_VGA3, 0x06060606);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX0_BB_GAIN_ATTEN, 0x0);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX1_BB_GAIN_ATTEN, 0x0);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX0_RF_GAIN_ATTEN, 0x6C6C666C);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX1_RF_GAIN_ATTEN, 0x6C6C666C);
does your 6352 wifi work?
case 2:
} else if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5390) ||
rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5392)) {
} else if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5592)) {
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG0, 0x00000404);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG1, 0x00000000);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG2, 0x00000000);
} else if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5350)) {
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG0, 0x00000404);
} else if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT6352)) {
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, MIMO_PS_CFG, 0x00000002);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_PIN_CFG, 0x00150F0F);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_ALC_VGA3, 0x06060606);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX0_BB_GAIN_ATTEN, 0x0);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX1_BB_GAIN_ATTEN, 0x0);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX0_RF_GAIN_ATTEN, 0x6C6C666C);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX1_RF_GAIN_ATTEN, 0x6C6C666C);
does your 6352 wifi still work?
On 10/10/2018, Stanislaw Gruszka <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 02:06:58PM +0200, Daniel Golle wrote:
>> > > https://github.com/psyborg55/linux/commit/24b46d482590a87553df1de0b5c8032f363cb7cf
>> > > ?
>> > >
>> > > using this code to determine 7620 soc
>> > >
>> > > if (rt == RT5390 && rt2x00_is_soc(rt2x00dev))
>> > > rt = RT6352;
>> > >
>> > > somehow did not work in rt2800_init_registers routine. i could
>> > > verify
>> > > that by removing tx_sw_cfg registers from rt6352 and the wifi would
>> > > still work, unless removed them from rt5390 also
>> >
>> > I tested by adding additional printk("Init RT6352 registers\n"); in
>> > if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT6352)) branch. The message was printed:
>> >
>> > [ 68.049946] ieee80211 phy0: rt2x00_set_rt: Info - RT chipset 6352,
>> > rev 0500 detected
>> > [ 68.065392] ieee80211 phy0: rt2x00_set_rf: Info - RF chipset 7620
>> > detected
>> > [ 68.079777] ieee80211 phy0: Selected rate control algorithm
>> > 'minstrel_ht'
>> > [ 68.177760] kmodloader: done loading kernel modules from
>> > /etc/modules.d/*
>> > [ 68.825758] urandom_read: 5 callbacks suppressed
>> > [ 68.825768] random: jshn: uninitialized urandom read (4 bytes read)
>> > [ 77.792400] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device eth0
>> > [ 77.825045] br-lan: port 1(eth0.1) entered blocking state
>> > [ 77.836032] br-lan: port 1(eth0.1) entered disabled state
>> > [ 77.847156] device eth0.1 entered promiscuous mode
>> > [ 77.856739] device eth0 entered promiscuous mode
>> > [ 77.931043] br-lan: port 1(eth0.1) entered blocking state
>> > [ 77.941861] br-lan: port 1(eth0.1) entered forwarding state
>> > [ 77.953171] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): br-lan: link is not ready
>> > [ 78.849852] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): br-lan: link becomes
>> > ready
>> > [ 82.302306] Init RT6352 registers
>> >
>> > Perhaps rt2x00_is_soc(rt2x00dev) does not work on this particular
>> > system
>> > that you have and device is configured as RT5390 ? I.e. maybe this is
>> > PCIe device. This should be printed in :
>> >
>> > ieee80211 phy0: rt2x00_set_rt: Info - RT chipset 6352, rev 0500
>> > detected
>> >
>> > line, you should have 'RT chipset 5390' instead.
>>
>> RT6352 is the pre-mediatek-merge name of MT7620A/N. It is always a SoC.
>> The RF part of both MT7620A and MT7620N identifies as RT5390. The
>> vendor driver also uses an equivalent check to destinguish between the
>> actual PCIe/USB RT5390xx and RT6352, see
>>
>> https://github.com/i80s/mtk-sources/blob/master/mt7620/src/include/rtmp_chip.h#L114
>
> Yes , but this does not explain why things do not work as
> expected for Tomislav, which IIUC use RT5390 configuration.
>
> Perhaps the check:
>
> if (rt == RT5390 && rt2x00_is_soc(rt2x00dev))
> rt = RT6352;
>
> should be some how modified to work on Tomislav's hardware ?
>
> Thanks
> Stanislaw
>
