On 10/29/2018 8:26 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Ajay Singh <[email protected]> writes: > >> On 10/9/2018 4:06 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: >>> On Tue, 2018-10-09 at 16:04 +0530, Ajay Singh wrote: >>> >>>>>> +typedef void (*wilc_remain_on_chan_expired)(void *, u32); >>>>>> +typedef void (*wilc_remain_on_chan_ready)(void *); >>>> I think as per coding style the typedef for function pointer are allowed. >>> True, I guess, but why do you need them? >> Actually these function pointer are used in multiple places i.e inside >> the struct and also for passing as the argument for the function. So i >> think its better to keep them as typedef to simplify and avoid any 'line >> over 80 chars' checkpatch issue. But anyway if you suggest we can modify >> to remove these typedefs . > Please remove them, they just make the code harder to read.
Sure, I will remove it. Regards, Ajay
