On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 22:08 +0000, [email protected] wrote: > > On 10/11/2018 12:01 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > > Agree. parameter validation can be done before scheduling the work, > > > and hence appropriate error can be returned to caller . > > > > > > > If I got your point correctly, you are referring to the lines that > > > stores the parameters into the hif_drv->cfg_values. > > > > Well, I was actually thinking that I'm not even sure why you schedule > > work at all! > > Do you mean we should be doing the work from the cfg context? > Note that this is called cfg80211_ops.set_wiphy_params(), and involves > locking mutexes, packing the wids, bus operations, and waiting for the > device to respond.
That *should* be fine - how long do you expect that to take? johannes
