Hi Michal,
On 2020/2/3 下午3:12, Michal Simek wrote:
On 03. 02. 20 7:09, qwang2 wrote:
Hi Amit,
On 2020/2/3 下午1:51, Amit Kumar Mahapatra wrote:
Hi,
The patch looks fine to me.
But I have few queries, @Michal Simek <mailto:[email protected]>
kindly share your thoughts.
I had sent spi-nor framework and zynq/zynqmp qspi driver rebse_v5.4
patches to https://gitenterprise.xilinx.com/Linux/linux-xlnx and
@qwang2 <mailto:[email protected]> has sent spi-nor
framework and zynq/zynqmp qspi driver rebse_v5.4 patches to
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-dev/tree/?h=standard/xlnx-soc
Implementation wise there is a diff between both these trees w.r.t
spi-nor framework and zynq/zynqmp qspi driver files.
Are these trees independent of each other, hence we can have diff
between both these trees ?
Yes, they are independent. The rebase_v5.4 patches in
https://gitenterprise.xilinx.com/Linux/linux-xlnx will be applied to the
later linux-yocto kernel versions (v5.5, v5.6, etc).
At some point there should be some synchronization done.
Yes, I will do the synchronization at some point.
Thanks,
Quanyang
M
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#8364):
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/8364
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/69464832/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
