Hi, On 14. 12. 20 10:48, quanyang.wang wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On 12/14/20 5:25 PM, Michal Simek wrote: >> Hi Quanyang, >> >> On 08. 12. 20 10:55, quanyang.wang wrote: >>> Hi Bruce & Michal, >>> >>> Would you please help review patches and remove the obsolete branch >>> standard/xlnx-soc in linux-yocto-dev >>> >>> and apply them to the new branch standard/xlnx-soc? >>> >>> There are 1447 patches in this pull request, and it contains three >>> parts: >>> >>> 1. The commits 3012dfac7ac7..8858495ac334 (4 patches) are picked from >>> Michal's git tree >>> >>> git://git.monstr.eu/linux-2.6-microblaze.git zynqmp/dt. These commits >>> are used to enable mainline >>> >>> psgtr driver and sata. >>> >>> 2. The commits 6a27662e42ee..9a6229a7fd81 (5 patches) are made by me. >>> There is one mainline-reverted patch >>> >>> which is used to revert mainlne DP driver (I still use SDK DP driver >>> this time because the DP driver in mainline lacks >>> >>> some features). The four patches left are to fix issues in mainline >>> gqspi drivers and they have been reviewed by Amit. >>> >>> 3. The 1438 patches are picked from SDK >>> https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx.git xlnx_rebase_v5.4 (tag >>> xlnx_rebase_v5.4_2020.2). >>> >>> There are some modifications in them since I am using mainline >>> psgtr/dpdma drivers instead of SDK's. >>> >>> >>> And the features as below are tested roughly: >>> >>> On zcu102: >>> >>> SATA / USB / Ethernet / PCIe / GQSPI (dual mode) / DisplayPort (display) >>> / MMC >>> >> I have started to do v5.10 xilinx rebase tree (not done yet) and I see >> when I compare it with mine that a lot of things are not fully correct. >> I see several drivers which are using eemi ops not being fixed. > > Thanks for the updating. I only build it pass by using config file > xilinx_zynqmp_defconfig (disable RSA) and xilinx_zynq_defconfig > > since we only support ZCU102/ZC706/ZC702. Furthermore, we only support > parts of features in ZCU102/ZC706/ZC702. > > As for these features (mostly FPGA-related) which we don't support, I > just keep them as they are in the patches.
I really appreciate your effort on making these trees. But isn't from your point of view better to just focus on drivers/components which target just these 3 boards? Our goal is definitely upstream everything to get rid of these painful part but it takes a lot of times and not all the time properly aligned with other planning. Thanks, Michal
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#9255): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/9255 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/78800150/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
