Hi, On 14. 12. 20 12:59, quanyang.wang wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On 12/14/20 7:22 PM, Michal Simek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 14. 12. 20 10:48, quanyang.wang wrote: >>> Hi Michal, >>> >>> On 12/14/20 5:25 PM, Michal Simek wrote: >>>> Hi Quanyang, >>>> >>>> On 08. 12. 20 10:55, quanyang.wang wrote: >>>>> Hi Bruce & Michal, >>>>> >>>>> Would you please help review patches and remove the obsolete branch >>>>> standard/xlnx-soc in linux-yocto-dev >>>>> >>>>> and apply them to the new branch standard/xlnx-soc? >>>>> >>>>> There are 1447 patches in this pull request, and it contains three >>>>> parts: >>>>> >>>>> 1. The commits 3012dfac7ac7..8858495ac334 (4 patches) are picked from >>>>> Michal's git tree >>>>> >>>>> git://git.monstr.eu/linux-2.6-microblaze.git zynqmp/dt. These commits >>>>> are used to enable mainline >>>>> >>>>> psgtr driver and sata. >>>>> >>>>> 2. The commits 6a27662e42ee..9a6229a7fd81 (5 patches) are made by me. >>>>> There is one mainline-reverted patch >>>>> >>>>> which is used to revert mainlne DP driver (I still use SDK DP driver >>>>> this time because the DP driver in mainline lacks >>>>> >>>>> some features). The four patches left are to fix issues in mainline >>>>> gqspi drivers and they have been reviewed by Amit. >>>>> >>>>> 3. The 1438 patches are picked from SDK >>>>> https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx.git xlnx_rebase_v5.4 (tag >>>>> xlnx_rebase_v5.4_2020.2). >>>>> >>>>> There are some modifications in them since I am using mainline >>>>> psgtr/dpdma drivers instead of SDK's. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And the features as below are tested roughly: >>>>> >>>>> On zcu102: >>>>> >>>>> SATA / USB / Ethernet / PCIe / GQSPI (dual mode) / DisplayPort >>>>> (display) >>>>> / MMC >>>>> >>>> I have started to do v5.10 xilinx rebase tree (not done yet) and I see >>>> when I compare it with mine that a lot of things are not fully correct. >>>> I see several drivers which are using eemi ops not being fixed. >>> Thanks for the updating. I only build it pass by using config file >>> xilinx_zynqmp_defconfig (disable RSA) and xilinx_zynq_defconfig >>> >>> since we only support ZCU102/ZC706/ZC702. Furthermore, we only support >>> parts of features in ZCU102/ZC706/ZC702. >>> >>> As for these features (mostly FPGA-related) which we don't support, I >>> just keep them as they are in the patches. >> I really appreciate your effort on making these trees. >> But isn't from your point of view better to just focus on >> drivers/components which target just these 3 boards? > > For now we only support 3 boards, but more features on these 3 boards > and more other > > boards will be added into the support list sometime in the future, so I > need to port all > > SDK patches to deal with this situation. Just picking parts of patches > will make it sticky when > > we want to enable new features and new boards.
I understand it but not sure what to do with this series. If make sense to let this go it and then replace it by Xilinx version. Or try to fix this series directly. What's your preference? Thanks, Michal
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#9264): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/9264 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/78800150/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
