Hello David,

Le 23.10.2012 08:49, David Miller a écrit :
[...]
>
> It's really demoralizing to sit down to read a large 15 entry
> patch series and this is the first thing I see:
>
>>  /*
>> - * check whether we can compress the IID to 16 bits,
>> - * it's possible for unicast adresses with first 49 bits are zero 
>> only.
>> - */
>> +* check whether we can compress the IID to 16 bits,
>> +* it's possible for unicast adresses with first 49 bits are zero 
>> only.
>> +*/
>
> Don't break the comment indentation, it was perfectly fine.
>
> I'm not reviewing the rest of the series, you'll need to repost
> the entire thing after you fix this.
>
> And if you're smart you'll make sure there aren't similar coding
> style issues in the rest of your patches, else it's going to take
> a long time to merge this crap into the tree.

Sorry about that, I failed to catch that mistake of mine (and several 
other ones that Jan spotted). I'll rework my patchset and resubmit. 
Thank you for pointing out this issue.

Regards,
Tony

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list
Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel

Reply via email to