Hi Alan,

(Before I start, I'd like to say that I'm grateful to everyone for
their efforts. Also, I'm not trying to point a finger at anyone here).

Thanks for your email. You raised a pretty valid point. When I first
took interest in IEEE 802.15.4, I went to the linux-zigbee website. I
thought this was the place where new code will go... and weeks later I
found out that the newest code was ported to net-next. Too many people
on the list seems to repeat the same "mistake".

It seems a lot of the key actors are currently very busy, so I would
suggest a few "quick" changes that, I believe, would make life easier
for newcomers:
- linux-zigbee.sf.net: placing a banner on each pages advertising that
  new efforts are on  http://code.google.com/p/linux-wsn/
- updating the hardware support page on linux-zigbee. Some devices,
  like the econotag are marked as "supported" but it takes a few
  patches to get them to work reliably. Indicate that the driver has
  not been ported to net-next yet when it applies.
- if it does not require too much effort: provide a working tree
  derived from net-next, where we would apply our patches on it for
  everyone to test
- upgrade the userspace tools to fix the issue with libnl (so far, I've
  seen two patches for this on the linux-zigbee the mailing list). I
  guess the tools are currently working for very little people.
- this mailing list is fine, we should keep it; even through the legacy
  "zigbee" portion of the name is confusing

I also agree that the name linux-wsn, or any other name that does not
contain "zigbee", would be more appropriate and less misleading.

Regards,
Tony



Le Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:09:08 -0500,
Alan Ott <a...@signal11.us> a écrit :

> Hello,
> 
> I'd like to get some clarification and start some discussion on what
> the path forward is for the linux-zigbee project and team. Currently
> I see our situation as follows:
> 
> 1. linux-zigbee.sf.net (first website)
>     * Mailing list (this one)
>     * Userspace tools
>         * recently updated, some patches are still outstanding (Tony's
> Github tree).
>     * kernel
>         * Not updated in 6 months
>     * documentation
>         * mostly related to the linux-zigbee project kernel. Some out
> of date.
> 
> 2. http://code.google.com/p/linux-wsn/ (second website)
>     * information related to the implementation which is in the
> mainline kernel.
>     * no code currently hosted.
>     * documentation
>         * related to the mainline kernel implementation
> 
> It seems to me like we have some work to do regarding our front-facing
> presentation to the world. Currently the two projects and websites
> are a source of confusion for many newcomers. The first website is
> likely what people will land on first when searching, but the second
> more accurately describes the most recent developments of the project
> (ie: code in the mainline kernel).
> 
> The other issue of course is the misnomer of Linux-Zigbee, since we
> are not and likely will not ever be implementing the Zigbee protocol.
> 
> How do you, the maintainers and contributors, feel we should remedy
> this situation?
> 
> My feeling is that the websites should definitely be merged, and the
> current linux-zigbee kernel be marked as legacy (for reference, and
> as a temporary repository of features and drivers which have not been
> merged upstream yet). Further, since the linux-zigbee name has been a
> misnomer for years, my opinion would be that we start using the
> linux-wsn (or some other) name for this project. Current website
> links can of course be maintained from linux-zigbee.sf.net, but
> anything with the words linux-zigbee on them should clearly reference
> the new name (whatever that may be), and link to the new site.
> 
> So the above is just one man's opinion, and I'm happy to be told to go
> pound sand or "we like it the way it is" or whatever. It just seems
> that there's a lot of confusion being presented from our community's
> online presence, and I think there are some good opportunities to
> make it better.
> 
> I hope this email can stir up some discussion, and I'm happy to help
> in whatever way possible, as I know the maintainers are very busy.
> 
> Alan.
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list
Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel

Reply via email to