On 03/18/2013 07:03 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Alan Ott <a...@signal11.us> wrote:
>> On 03/18/2013 03:55 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> This line is on the hardware page twice:
>>> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/linux-zigbee/wiki/HardwareSupport
>>>
>>>
>>> AT86RF231Supportedat86rf230Atmel AT86RF231 device connected directly
>>> to CPU/SoC via SPI bus.
>>> Remove the copy in the legacy section?
>> Hi Jon,
>>
>> I left it in both sections because it is supported by both kernels, and
>> neither set of drivers (legacy or mainline) is a superset of the other.
>>
>>> MC1322xSupportedserialThanks to Mariano Alvira efforts chip
>>> (http://mc1322x.devl.org/)
>>> Maybe note that this is a USB stick that you can plug into a desktop.
>> What if I instead change that to Redwire Econotag? The MC1322x is not
>> supported by Linux, but the Econotoag (with the Linux firmware) is.
> Whatever you think is best.
Changed to:
https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/linux-zigbee/wiki/HardwareSupport
> I'd like to see more people using the
> linux-zigbee code in order to get more interoperability testing going
> against Contiki.
Yes! I would to. Right now some header compression is keeping us from
integrating with stock Contiki.
> Easiest way to run the Linux code is by plugging
> some type of USB stick into a desktop.
>
> Instead people are running the RPL root inside the Econtag and using
> tuntap6 to bridge the networks over serial. That avoids the whole
> interoperability issue.
Yes, actually running the Linux 802.15.4 code is what we want to aim for.
Alan.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
_______________________________________________
Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list
Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel
