Hi Hannes,

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 02:47:54PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 02:45:47PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote:
> > This was the old behaviour, we decide it to make it like this:
> > 
> > fail = ...
> > fail |= ....
> > 
> > if (fail)
> >     ...
> > 
> > We discussed that already at the linux-zigbee-devel mailinglist.
> > I don't know what I should do now, on linux-zigbee-devel we decide it to
> > this way, now we decide it in a other way...
> 
> Oh, I didn't know. Please just take my mail as a suggestion. If there
> already was a discussion and you had a consensus about that please just
> ignore my mails. :)
>
This discussion was only with two persons.
So I am happy to hear some other opinions. :-)

Regards
Alex

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. 
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list
Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel

Reply via email to