Hi Hannes, On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 02:47:54PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 02:45:47PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote: > > This was the old behaviour, we decide it to make it like this: > > > > fail = ... > > fail |= .... > > > > if (fail) > > ... > > > > We discussed that already at the linux-zigbee-devel mailinglist. > > I don't know what I should do now, on linux-zigbee-devel we decide it to > > this way, now we decide it in a other way... > > Oh, I didn't know. Please just take my mail as a suggestion. If there > already was a discussion and you had a consensus about that please just > ignore my mails. :) > This discussion was only with two persons. So I am happy to hear some other opinions. :-)
Regards Alex ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel