Alexander Aring wrote: > lowpan_size = skb->transport_header - skb->network_header; > > This patch only preparing it that we can do that. The alternative would > be to set it in skb_cb, that was the old behaviour. Maybe I should set > it in the skb_cb, or not?
Maybe you could mention this in the description: you're setting these "standard" skb fields because you'll later use them to get rid of a use of "not-so-safe" skb->cb. - Werner ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel
