Hi Werner,

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 05:20:48PM -0300, Werner Almesberger wrote:
> Alexander Aring wrote:
> > @@ -1065,7 +1065,7 @@ lowpan_process_data(struct sk_buff *skb)
> >             skb_copy_to_linear_data(skb, &uh, sizeof(struct udphdr));
> >  
> >             lowpan_raw_dump_table(__func__, "raw UDP header dump",
> > -                                 (u8 *)&uh, sizeof(uh));
> > +                           (u8 *)&uh, sizeof(uh));
> 
> This one still isn't right, according to checkpatch --strict.
> 

I don't know which version you using, but checkpatch --strict seems fine
for this change.

I using Version: 0.32 from net-next.
> > @@ -1080,8 +1080,8 @@ lowpan_process_data(struct sk_buff *skb)
> >              "nexthdr = 0x%02x\n\thop_lim = %d\n", hdr.version,
> >              ntohs(hdr.payload_len), hdr.nexthdr, hdr.hop_limit);
> >  
> > -   lowpan_raw_dump_table(__func__, "raw header dump", (u8 *)&hdr,
> > -                                                   sizeof(hdr));
> > +   lowpan_raw_dump_table(__func__, "raw header dump",
> > +                         (u8 *)&hdr, sizeof(hdr));
> 
> This one passes.
> 
> > @@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@ static int lowpan_get_mac_header_length(struct 
> > sk_buff *skb)
> >  
> >  static int
> >  lowpan_fragment_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 *head,
> > -                   int mlen, int plen, int offset, int type)
> > +           int mlen, int plen, int offset, int type)
> 
> checkpatch --strict dislikes it.
> 
My version of checkpatch likes it.
> > @@ -1142,8 +1142,8 @@ lowpan_fragment_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 *head,
> >             skb_copy_from_linear_data_offset(skb, offset + mlen,
> >                                     skb_put(frag, plen), plen);
> 
> By the way, checkpatch --strict also complains about this one (and
> several other things as well.)
> 
> >  
> > -   lowpan_raw_dump_table(__func__, " raw fragment dump", frag->data,
> > -                                                           frag->len);
> > +   lowpan_raw_dump_table(__func__, " raw fragment dump",
> > +                         frag->data, frag->len);
> 
> This one looks good now.
> 

All seems finde with checkpatch --strict from net-next for me.

- Alex

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list
Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel

Reply via email to