On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:38:56PM +0530, varkabhad...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Varka Bhadram <var...@cdac.in> > > This patch fix struct dgram_sock defination style. > > We are using bit fields in the struct dgram_sock but > every bit field of type 'unsigned int'. In this case > remaining bit fields are unused here. > > So by changing the style of declaration we can utilise > every bit field. >
yes, this can save some bytes but it doesn't matter. Your patches doesn't change anything on the behaviour. Patch 2/2 is also valid for a bool and you describe to fix something. If this would be invalid then the you need to fix it because you changed the behaviour in Patch 1/2. This is "We broken something in Patch 1/2, so fix it in Patch 2/2". Next time you need to fixup Patch 2/2 with 1/2. I don't apply this series, sorry. - Alex ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel
