Alex, On 07/28/2014 02:01 PM, Alexander Aring wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:38:56PM +0530, varkabhad...@gmail.com wrote: >> From: Varka Bhadram <var...@cdac.in> >> >> This patch fix struct dgram_sock defination style. >> >> We are using bit fields in the struct dgram_sock but >> every bit field of type 'unsigned int'. In this case >> remaining bit fields are unused here. >> >> So by changing the style of declaration we can utilise >> every bit field. >> > yes, this can save some bytes but it doesn't matter. Your patches > doesn't change anything on the behaviour.
saving some bytes on the kernel level is matters. We are saving 24bytes here. With the less memory utilization we are achieving the same behavior ..? Thanks.. -- Regards, Varka Bhadram. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel
