Nat Hays wrote: > I have never participated in this, but as I have a new nano, i.e. the now > old one, I am furious! I think that apple, like microsoft before them, are > evil! Ee-vill! Argh. Sorry, but I need to vent. We should lead an armed raid > into the factory, hold Steve Jobs at iPhone point, and demand the scripting > codes or what ever we need to let me play iDoom! Argh!
Calm down, it doesn't mean we do drop down the second generation. Hopefully, the price of iPod 2G will drop down (especially broken ones), so we will have more material to work with. What I hope for is that Apple kept the exact same firmware protection scheme... this should help us to access more iPod once the 2G will be broken down. But, it's true that Apple is making it difficult for us as they did propose new release of the nano each year since three years... aiming at a moving target is quite difficult. In conclusion, Anton was very likely right. We should focus on the 2G, maybe collect some data on the 3G (if it can help to reverse the 2G), but definitely finish it up with the 2G first. I'm currently working (on my very rare spare time) on a rewrite of the documents. And I did contact some other people to help us out to extract the content of the ROM. Things are going slooooooowly mainly because there are very few contributions from project members and from outside. Regards -- Emmanuel Fleury Imagination is more important than knowledge. -- Albert Einstein _______________________________________________ Linux4nano-dev mailing list Linux4nano-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev http://www.linux4nano.org
