On 07/09/2007, Emmanuel Fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nat Hays wrote:
> > I have never participated in this, but as I have a new nano, i.e. the now
> > old one, I am furious! I think that apple, like microsoft before them, are
> > evil! Ee-vill! Argh. Sorry, but I need to vent. We should lead an armed raid
> > into the factory, hold Steve Jobs at iPhone point, and demand the scripting
> > codes or what ever we need to let me play iDoom! Argh!
>
> Calm down, it doesn't mean we do drop down the second generation.
> Hopefully, the price of iPod 2G will drop down (especially broken ones),
> so we will have more material to work with.
>
> What I hope for is that Apple kept the exact same firmware protection
> scheme... this should help us to access more iPod once the 2G will be
> broken down.
>
> But, it's true that Apple is making it difficult for us as they did
> propose new release of the nano each year since three years... aiming at
> a moving target is quite difficult.
>
> In conclusion, Anton was very likely right. We should focus on the 2G,
> maybe collect some data on the 3G (if it can help to reverse the 2G),
> but definitely finish it up with the 2G first.
I really think we should collect data about iPhone hacks, the few I
read about let me think we probably got quite similar encryptions.
But the few I found let me think that somebody very lucky found a full
encryption documentation. ("tombée du camion" in french :P)
(And, needless to say, iPhone hacks are quite popular currently ;) )
JD.
_______________________________________________
Linux4nano-dev mailing list
Linux4nano-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev
http://www.linux4nano.org
