It's been confusing to keep track of everyone that's willing to build a nanotron. There's been multiple people willing try try their hand at building one but I haven't heard back from them. I think it would be best if everyone who can build a 3G nanotron post here to keep everything in the same spot. Building a nanotron is really all we can do unless another suitable vulnerability is found.
Peace On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Taylor Gordon <tgcodeproje...@gmail.com>wrote: > " It could of course be possible that there was some bug within the > nanotron hardware or software that made it fail, but that's unlikely > either. > " > > Not so unlikely I think :P Honestly, (we know who was running it..) wasn't > clear what he was doing with the thing. In fact, at first I think he left > the instruction note in the note folder, which also could have messed it > up... > > But I haven't seen him in a while, to get into contact with him. > > Bottom line - I think we should take another shot at the nanotrons. Won't > hurt. > > Taylor > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 3:56 PM, The Seven <these...@gmx.net> wrote: > > > Honestly, I don't really have a clue what to do about the 3G problem. I > > can't think of a way how this thing could escape a nanotron, but it > > obviously did. > > It could of course be possible that there was some bug within the > > nanotron hardware or software that made it fail, but that's unlikely > > either. > > So the only thing I could think of that may actually help is build yet > > another nanotron and have it attack another nano. And if this still > > fails, we may want to try a different firmware revision. > > > > Do you have the neccessary hardware and tools to build one? Mindstorms > > seems to work quite well, but the arduino-based solution should work, > > too, like most other microcontrollers. Actually, a few servos or > > solenoids, some transistors, and a serial port in bitbanging mode might > > work, too. > > > > Keanen Shaw schrieb: > > > Hey people, since I'm on the mailing list I thought it would be > > appropriate > > > for me to actually say something without you blokes ignoring it. So, > for > > the > > > last time, I have an iPod Nano 3G that I can run any kind of test on > you > > > want. It is pretty much disposable, as I have no way to use it now that > > I'm > > > running Puppy Linux. Anyone want to say "nice to know" or "we'll keep > in > > > touch"? I'm not going to deal with this bullshit anymore. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Linux4nano-dev mailing list > > > Linux4nano-dev@gna.org > > > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev > > > http://www.linux4nano.org > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux4nano-dev mailing list > > Linux4nano-dev@gna.org > > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev > > http://www.linux4nano.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux4nano-dev mailing list > Linux4nano-dev@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev > http://www.linux4nano.org > _______________________________________________ Linux4nano-dev mailing list Linux4nano-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev http://www.linux4nano.org
