True, but Apple would never have imagined that the older ipods would be hacked at the time ;)
It's possible its there. Worth a shot. Either that, or we may have to hunt through the DFU.. On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 5:47 PM, The Seven <these...@gmx.net> wrote: > stooo already got a broken 3G, but IIRC that one may indeed be too > broken for hunting JTAG, if it even exists. I seriously doubt they were > that dumb once again... > > Taylor Gordon schrieb: > > I agree. Unless of course someone is willing to donate a 3G to stooo for > > JTAG'ing :) > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Cory Walker <cwalke...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> It's been confusing to keep track of everyone that's willing to build a > >> nanotron. There's been multiple people willing try try their hand at > >> building one but I haven't heard back from them. I think it would be > best > >> if > >> everyone who can build a 3G nanotron post here to keep everything in the > >> same spot. Building a nanotron is really all we can do unless another > >> suitable vulnerability is found. > >> > >> Peace > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Taylor Gordon < > tgcodeproje...@gmail.com > >>> wrote: > >>> " It could of course be possible that there was some bug within the > >>> nanotron hardware or software that made it fail, but that's unlikely > >>> either. > >>> " > >>> > >>> Not so unlikely I think :P Honestly, (we know who was running it..) > >> wasn't > >>> clear what he was doing with the thing. In fact, at first I think he > left > >>> the instruction note in the note folder, which also could have messed > it > >>> up... > >>> > >>> But I haven't seen him in a while, to get into contact with him. > >>> > >>> Bottom line - I think we should take another shot at the nanotrons. > Won't > >>> hurt. > >>> > >>> Taylor > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 3:56 PM, The Seven <these...@gmx.net> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Honestly, I don't really have a clue what to do about the 3G problem. > I > >>>> can't think of a way how this thing could escape a nanotron, but it > >>>> obviously did. > >>>> It could of course be possible that there was some bug within the > >>>> nanotron hardware or software that made it fail, but that's unlikely > >>>> either. > >>>> So the only thing I could think of that may actually help is build yet > >>>> another nanotron and have it attack another nano. And if this still > >>>> fails, we may want to try a different firmware revision. > >>>> > >>>> Do you have the neccessary hardware and tools to build one? Mindstorms > >>>> seems to work quite well, but the arduino-based solution should work, > >>>> too, like most other microcontrollers. Actually, a few servos or > >>>> solenoids, some transistors, and a serial port in bitbanging mode > might > >>>> work, too. > >>>> > >>>> Keanen Shaw schrieb: > >>>>> Hey people, since I'm on the mailing list I thought it would be > >>>> appropriate > >>>>> for me to actually say something without you blokes ignoring it. So, > >>> for > >>>> the > >>>>> last time, I have an iPod Nano 3G that I can run any kind of test on > >>> you > >>>>> want. It is pretty much disposable, as I have no way to use it now > >> that > >>>> I'm > >>>>> running Puppy Linux. Anyone want to say "nice to know" or "we'll keep > >>> in > >>>>> touch"? I'm not going to deal with this bullshit anymore. > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Linux4nano-dev mailing list > >>>>> Linux4nano-dev@gna.org > >>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev > >>>>> http://www.linux4nano.org > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Linux4nano-dev mailing list > >>>> Linux4nano-dev@gna.org > >>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev > >>>> http://www.linux4nano.org > >>>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Linux4nano-dev mailing list > >>> Linux4nano-dev@gna.org > >>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev > >>> http://www.linux4nano.org > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Linux4nano-dev mailing list > >> Linux4nano-dev@gna.org > >> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev > >> http://www.linux4nano.org > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux4nano-dev mailing list > > Linux4nano-dev@gna.org > > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev > > http://www.linux4nano.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux4nano-dev mailing list > Linux4nano-dev@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev > http://www.linux4nano.org > _______________________________________________ Linux4nano-dev mailing list Linux4nano-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/linux4nano-dev http://www.linux4nano.org
