Stefan, >It's bus 1, that LinuxBIOS and OpenBIOS >find really well, only Linux refuses to see it.
Do you update the irq_table.c's interrupt router bus no. from to "0" to "1"? Regards YH. -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Stefan Reinauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 发送时间: 2003年9月29日 2:18 收件人: Eric W. Biederman 抄送: ron minnich; YhLu; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 主题: Re: config tool + tree enumeration * Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030929 00:38]: > And until I have a reason I don't see the point, in making > a change. Hm. You are right. With some more tests I found out that this solution only fixes the problem occasionally. It seems that the chance that it works is higher with the number of tries. Really weird. > Mostly I suspect this is a matter of keeping the irq tables > in sync, or something similar where hard codes don't match the dynamic > assignments. And if that is the case we need to dig and do a good fix > instead of papering over the problem. If LinuxBIOS hangs during CPU/Northbridge enumeration, can this really be a matter of irq tables? I thought that they are touched quite a while later in the setup process. I suspect it might be connected to the highest bus number set in the default resource map, but I did not try more in this direction yet. Additionally I have Linux moaning that the irq table contains entries for a bus that does not exist. It's bus 1, that LinuxBIOS and OpenBIOS find really well, only Linux refuses to see it. Stefan -- Architecture Team SuSE Linux AG _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
