Conceptually I break it down into two separate pieces. One being the boot portion and one being the payload. The different kernels make sense as an option on which payload is run. The boot portion should be pretty stable. And the fallback boot would deal with a failed boot update.

Jordan

At 12:09 PM 11/19/2003, you wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> I think of the fallback as the recovery if the normal fails.  This is kind
> of an ideological point, but shouldn't the fallback be a minimal recovery
> version?

why? the fallback could be one of two linux kernels. It all depends on how
mmuch space is available.

ron

_______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Reply via email to