Adam Megacz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You really should check out darcs. I did an extensive arch/darcs > comparison, and the XWT project (xwt.org) is going with the latter. > Vastly simpler than either bk or arch but with all the same features.
I looked on the core mailing list and saw a version control discussion but did not see your comparison. As for features at least as of tla 1.1 I do not believe this to be the case. Feel free to prove me wrong. It was mentioned in some of your discussion that darcs uses reverse format patches. I am leary of that because it was exactly that ``optimization'' in RCS which made CVS suck at branches. For myself I am branch happy. And I don't think I like the idea of having to create another copy of a repository to have a branch. Besides which darcs does not appear to have the merging capabilities that are present in arch. I will keep darcs in mind. It always interesting to see another version control system. Eric _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
