Adam Megacz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) writes: > > As for features at least as of tla 1.1 I do not believe this to > > be the case. Feel free to prove me wrong. > > Which features do you find present in tla that you do not see in darcs?
- Written in C, so it is more hackable, and it has more hackers. - The ability to sign repositories (admittedly still beta but the subject did not even come up on the darcs list). There are a bunch of other places that are pluses and minuses but... I guess the really big difference between darcs and arch are global identifiers. arch has them darcs doesn't. This simplifies darcs quite a bit, but my gut feel is that some of the more interesting solutions involve global identifiers. Eric _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
