On 11 Mar 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > If the BIOS has to implement services an interpreted byte code where the > kernel provides the interpreter at least gives the kernel guys the > option of catching bugs, and working around them. I completely prefer > AML over BIOS callbacks.
YES! > Is AML turing complete? I am sure it is. I am sure that it would be able to pass the Turing test, it is so complex :-) ron _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
