On 11 Mar 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Basically byte code seems much more optional than a magic function you > can call. But in the practical it should be possible to fix the > firmware, and reflash if we did provide callbacks. I just like to err > as far as possible on the side of caution.
and byte code you can call is probably bad for keeping the processor cache, TLBs, etc. nice and current. > My preference is to provide no code that is run after the OS loads, and > just to specify some static table entries. The rest is essentially a > fallback position. yep. ron _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
