> > I have a PIII celeron. Where do I go loook to find what model that is > > so I know what to add into my config? > > That was a PGA370, right? I am guessing it is not in there, looking at the > tree.
Right. I created it. And really all it needs is the right cpu/intel/model_xxx in the config file. Currently I'm using model_6xx which is what the slot_2 used. > Currently, it's always enabled, but if you build a fallback-only payload, > then 'normal' won't get run. This is hokey, I know. So if I just remove all the normal stuff? What about all the reset16 and entry16 stuff? Looks to me like I pretty much have to re-write my MB config.lb > > Out of tree makes it a bit more difficult for me to keep all my stuff > > under one roof when I go to check it into my internal CVS. Why do you > > like out of tree? > > What I mean is, the .o and other objects out of the tree. Since you haven't really said specificlly what you don't like about in-tree builds I say what I do like. Having everything under one roof make it much easier for me to just take a snapshot of things. CVS is great but there are still loads of time when I'ts just more of a hassle. Sweet and simple. I can't tell you how many times I've had to go back to a snapshot and snag a binary that I wasn't able to reproduce due do some wierdness going on. Or just as a sanity check when wierdness is going on. Having things in seperate trees makes that harder. I do understand that having them differnt though does offer a lot of advantages in other areas. But I would say that what you really want is the ability to do it either way. My original point was though that it would be nice from a new board porters view if there was some kind of reference payload for each known good board and it was included. -- Richard A. Smith _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list Linuxbios@clustermatic.org http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios