On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Richard Smith wrote:
> So if I just remove all the normal stuff? What about all the reset16 > and entry16 stuff? Looks to me like I pretty much have to re-write my > MB config.lb no, not at all. It's the target/bitworks/richard/Config.lb that determines normal/fallback or fallback-only configuration, and that in turn will drive how the thing gets built > Since you haven't really said specificlly what you don't like about > in-tree builds I say what I do like. Having everything under one roof > make it much easier for me to just take a snapshot of things. CVS is > great but there are still loads of time when I'ts just more of a > hassle. Sweet and simple. I can't tell you how many times I've had > to go back to a snapshot and snag a binary that I wasn't able to > reproduce due do some wierdness going on. Or just as a sanity check > when wierdness is going on. good point. The only reason I like seperate trees is that if things get too weird I like to rm -rf freebios cvs blah blah co freebios and not affect any of my targets. That's all. > My original point was though that it would be nice from a new board > porters view if there was some kind of reference payload for each > known good board and it was included. good point. ron _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list Linuxbios@clustermatic.org http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
