Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ok so by design you really only want a single firmware image. > > > > Right.. I think Ron has me fixed up. I was unaware that there was an > overall flag that enabled/disabled the fallback system.
In the generic code yes. > > It should be straight forward to remove all of the tests etc for switching > > from a fallback to a normal image. > > Do I really have to remove them? Ron seemed to suggest that if I just > turn off the fallback suff then I will end up with only a singel > fallback image. I was thinking of the per board test that make the policy decision which image you should be in. > > For those of us who have field upgradable systems it makes a bigger > difference. > > Yeah I would say so... Since you guys have the power to render 1000 > paperweights with a single command. Ron came insanely close to doing just that a while ago. > Our product is going to go into Gasoline pumps. You would not believe > the lengths that some store operators go to so they can cheat the > consumer slightly per fillup. So our customer requires a flash update > to be physical mod. Now that is a sane reason not to have field upgradable parts. :) Eric _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list Linuxbios@clustermatic.org http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
