Stefan Reinauer schrieb: > * Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060412 06:17]: > >>Lu, Yinghai schrieb: >> >>>These should be DMI info ...., >> >>The later section (2.2 kb) really are DMI info. >> >>But I strongly doubt that the missing 128 kb in the middle are >>all DMI info. Especially the fact that here flash_rom reads >>a consecutive block of 0xff while the vendor BIOS image has >>real contents seems the wrong way. If it were DMI info, the >>vendor BIOS image should have the 0xff and not flash_rom. > > > What does that content look like?
Looks like valid x86 instructions. The following archive has both BIOS images (the extracted one and the vendor-suplied one) inside. http://www-ti.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/~hailfing/biosimages.tar.bz2 Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
