On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 05:30:53PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > * Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070630 17:17]: > > Bring the file cpu.h in sync with the current version of the code in > > the Linux kernel (as far as possible). The code is a lot simpler > > and shorter now. > > > > Also, add cpu_relax() (which is also part of the Linux file) which > > could be useful for busy-loops (but is currently not used). > > Drop the cpu_relax() from spinlock.h as it's not spinlock related in any > > way. > > > > The code builds, but is otherwise untested. > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Can you test with qemu? > > Otherwise > Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
r423. Tested in QEMU, but that's probably not enough, as we don't use the cpuid() function at the moment, I think. Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- linuxbios mailing list [email protected] http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
