On 9/27/07, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 27.09.2007 18:21, Robinson Tryon wrote: > > On 9/23/07, Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> To make the tool more useful we need > >> > >> - As many supported Super I/Os as possible. > >> > >> Supporting new ones is relatively easy, but a bit time-consuming. > >> You have to grab the datasheet, find out the ID/version of the > >> Super I/O and add it in the respective file (ite.c for ITE Super I/Os, > >> for example). For the dump functionality you have to add a (large) table > >> with all registers and their defaults. > > > > Okay -- I grabbed the code from SVN, compiled it and ran it on a few > > computers, but I didn't get any useful output (verbose mode was also > > pretty sparse). I assume that this means that my Super I/O chips are > > not supported, correct? > > Not supported by superiotool, however if there was any output at all, > we'd like to know it.
Ok. I'll re-run the tests when I get a chance and send in the output. > I can send dozens of ITE data sheets (even for now unavailable chips) > your way. Great. If you could just put those on a webserver someplace, that would be excellent. Any kind of preference on what chips get supported first? > > What's the vendor of your Super I/O? Well, as I said, I tested superiotool on multiple machines. I should be able to just crack the case on a machine and spot it on the motherboard, I assume? -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
