On 27.09.2007 18:45, Robinson Tryon wrote: > On 9/27/07, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 27.09.2007 18:21, Robinson Tryon wrote: >>> On 9/23/07, Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> To make the tool more useful we need >>>> >>>> - As many supported Super I/Os as possible. >>>> >>>> Supporting new ones is relatively easy, but a bit time-consuming. >>>> You have to grab the datasheet, find out the ID/version of the >>>> Super I/O and add it in the respective file (ite.c for ITE Super I/Os, >>>> for example). For the dump functionality you have to add a (large) table >>>> with all registers and their defaults. >>> Okay -- I grabbed the code from SVN, compiled it and ran it on a few >>> computers, but I didn't get any useful output (verbose mode was also >>> pretty sparse). I assume that this means that my Super I/O chips are >>> not supported, correct? >> Not supported by superiotool, however if there was any output at all, >> we'd like to know it. > > Ok. I'll re-run the tests when I get a chance and send in the output.
Thanks. >> I can send dozens of ITE data sheets (even for now unavailable chips) >> your way. > > Great. If you could just put those on a webserver someplace, that I have some worries about copyright issues. Yes, they were freely downloadable, but... > would be excellent. Any kind of preference on what chips get > supported first? Winbond and ITE are the ones where Uwe and I are specialized. >> What's the vendor of your Super I/O? > > Well, as I said, I tested superiotool on multiple machines. I should > be able to just crack the case on a machine and spot it on the > motherboard, I assume? Yes, but we'll probably be able to tell it from the short output without opening any machine. Carl-Daniel -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
