On Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:21:24 -0600, Eric Seppanen wrote: >If you really want to be friendly to bare-bones embedded or thin-client >systems, you could even make the fail-safe vs. agressive stuff able to be >compiled out, because it's conceivable that an embedded board might not >have battery-backed cmos ram-- I don't. Isn't CMOS normally located in the real-time clock chip? If so then our board dosn't have it either. -- Richard A. Smith Bitworks, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 501.846.5777 Sr. Design Engineer http://www.bitworks.com
- Re: SiS 630: Problem with enabling the CPU pipeline Eric W. Biederman
- Re: SiS 630: Problem with enabling the CPU pipeline Ronald G Minnich
- Re: SiS 630: Problem with enabling the CPU pipeline Ollie Lho
- Re: SiS 630: Problem with enabling the CPU pipeline Ronald G Minnich
- Re: SiS 630: Problem with enabling the CPU pipeline Eric Seppanen
- Re: SiS 630: Problem with enabling the CPU pipeline Ronald G Minnich
- Re: SiS 630: Problem with enabling the CPU pipeline Eric Seppanen
- Re: SiS 630: Problem with enabling the CPU pipeline Richard A. Smith
- Re: SiS 630: Problem with enabling the CPU pipeline Eric Seppanen
- Re: SiS 630: Problem with enabling the CPU pipeline Bari Ari
- Re: SiS 630: Problem with enabling the CPU pipeline Richard A. Smith
- Re: SiS 630: Problem with enabling the CPU pipeline Ronald G Minnich
- Re: SiS 630: Problem with enabling the CPU pipeline tyson
- POST in kernel Ronald G Minnich
- Re: SiS 630: Problem with enabling the CPU pipeline Eric Seppanen
- Re: SiS 630: Problem with enabling the CPU pipeline Ronald G Minnich