(Slightly OT speculation...)
> Date: 29 Aug 2001 12:22:23 -0600
> From: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I have seen reports that both Intel and IBM are working on chipsets
> that will support that. I think the reports were talking many way
> SMP but possibly that is because where Itanium is positioned. This
I'd have to dig up the article, but I recall a ComputerWorld tidbit
on IBM planning 32-way SMP, IIRC. I probably should post that link.
> looks like it may be in the McKinley time frame. I have a strange
> hunch that McKinley will be bus compatible with the P4. This is what
> I am picking up through osmosis reading the reviews.
I suppose that this makes sense. IMHO, the P4 chip is a disaster... it
would make sense for Intel to get $$$ from the "bleeding edge" crowd
who wants the latest-and-not-so-greatest, helping to get the new bus
technology in volume production.
Eddy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT
send mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, or you are likely to be blocked.
