Sorry to respond to my own post...
> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 01:44:13 +0000 (GMT)
> From: E.B. Dreger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Date: 29 Aug 2001 12:22:23 -0600
> > From: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > I have seen reports that both Intel and IBM are working on chipsets
> > that will support that. I think the reports were talking many way
> > SMP but possibly that is because where Itanium is positioned. This
>
> I'd have to dig up the article, but I recall a ComputerWorld tidbit
> on IBM planning 32-way SMP, IIRC. I probably should post that link.
http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO63083_NLTPM%2C00.html
In summary:
* IBM "Summit" chipset
* 16-way, _not_ 32-way like I thought
* Can run as multiple shared-resource machines.
Eddy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT
send mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, or you are likely to be blocked.
