Ronald G Minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > actually, since kexec and two kernel monte came along I stopped using > LOBOS. I still prefer some of the design decisions I made in LOBOS > (leaving VM on while you boot) but I think the other systems are "cleaner" > in some respects.
Well kexec still does that on the alpha. On x86 we can save memory by skipping that part, because we don't need to build up page tables... > So I think you should look at them. We don't want all these different > "kernel boots kernel" tools in use -- one or two will do the job. Discussion on the linux kernel maillist has reached consensus, on a lot of the design issues. So there is a pretty good chance we will see something in the 2.5 kernel. Assuming I can do a decent implementation... Eric
