At 12:53 PM 5/20/2002, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>Bill Arbaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > If you look at the list of items, it starts to resemble the 
> functionality of a
> > real OS.
> > This was Ron's insight with LinuxBIOS. Unfortunately, Linux is now too 
> big to
> > fit
> >
> > into most flash chips.
> >
> > We tried here at UMCP using Red Hat's eCos, but it was too limited. The 
> *BSD
> > OS's are too large as well. Etherboot has been a good alternative, but 
> as we
> > look
> >
> > at adding more and more. It will become OS like...something it wasn't 
> really
> > designed
> > to become.
> >
> > Ron played around with Plan9, and that seems to work.
> > It also has much of the support asked for on the wish list already.
> >
> > What are people's thoughts about Plan9?
>
>- Plan9 isn't a widely used OS so this doesn't trivially solve the
>   hardware support disparity.

The driver support looks pretty good to me, and I think it would be easier 
to develop
a driver for Plan9 than etherboot.

>- Plan9 might not go small enough.

Ron has managed to get a kernel small enough and it even had SSL support!

>Large scale usage depends on a strategy that is generally useful.  And for
>that size is an enourmous consideration.

The usage size of Plan9 is likely to be larger than etherboot.

>I will check it out, as there looks to be some potential with plan9.
>
>A lot really depends on what it takes to deploy this stuff.
>
>I guess we should also include in the wishlist encrypted signature checking.

We have that mostly done now in etherboot.  Since the semester almost over, I
expect Adam Agnew will have it all wrapped and announced shortly.

>My working hypothesis is that I will have to build a mini-os, to use
>for bootloader purposes.  And I will measure every solution against
>what it will take to build a mini-os.  The mini-os advantage is that
>it can steadily improve and not be tied to other goals.

Agreed. But, a specialized mini-os is huge effort. I'd prefer a small
general purpose OS.  Just look at the wishlist and you'll somebody
wants a little bit of everything.

>Eric

Reply via email to