http://www.xeltek.com/home.php http://www.xeltek.com/product.php?productid=16221 It's about $549.00
but no Linux support. Also there is some EEPROM emulator, then only about download time 1s. YH On 8/12/05, Ken Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, you are both wrong. The USB cable is used _only_ for power. > All data goes through the parallel port. It is a slow (5 minutes to > burn and 2 minutes to verify), cheap burner, but I have found it to be > extremely reliable. > > I was talking about the Enhanced Willem Universal Programmer. > Perhaps, the two of you were talking about another, possibly > hypothetical flash programmer. > > Disclaimer: I'm not using the newest Willem programmer, but I think > even the newest Willem programmer still uses USB only for power (They > include the option of an AC adapter that can be used instead of the > USB cable - an option my USB only powered, older unit lacks). > > YH wrote: > > > you are right. > > > 1. download image to burner buffer, NON USB need to 5s..., USB may only > > need 1s. > > 2. issue command to burn from buffer to flash. .... burner need 30s, > > flash_rom need 10s. > > > On 8/12/05, yhlu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I hope I could get one with USB2 cable and it could work with Linux. > > > > > > USB2 would be faster than others. > > On 8/12/05, Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't think it matters. Your bottleneck is not the bandwith to the > > programmer but the time it takes for the flash part to write a byte or > > block. Flash writes are slow. > > Sincerely, > > Ken Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > _______________________________________________ > LinuxBIOS mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios > _______________________________________________ LinuxBIOS mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
