On 8/12/05, yhlu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you are right. > > 1. download image to burner buffer, NON USB need to 5s..., USB may only need > 1s. > 2. issue command to burn from buffer to flash. .... burner need 30s, > flash_rom need 10s.
Ok.. So its the _device_ then thats non-optimal. A usb2 device may or may not be of any use. We have a Batronix USB programmer. It has a windows only interface that really sucks. I've been toying with writing a python cli for it. Looking at the windows program its obvious that the device downloads its frimware. Each chip that is supported has its own firmware. I've done a little bit of looking and its some sort of EZ-usb setup. I've haven't had the motivation but since you are asking about one I will go back this weekend and look at harder. If I can get some sort of cli for the batronix device it would be really sweet. Its a good little programmer but it just suffers from a horrible software interface. In fact, I've yet to use a programmer yet that I thought had interface worth a damn. -- Richard A. Smith _______________________________________________ LinuxBIOS mailing list [email protected] http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
