On Saturday 25 February 2006 4:34 pm, Abhishek Daga wrote: > --- Dinesh Joshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Friday 24 February 2006 17:15, Philip Tellis wrote: > > > no, it's fine. there's no harm in discussing various freedoms > > > like the freedom of the press and the right to privacy. > > since we wanted the discussion... >
> Right to privacy : not explcitly mentioned in the constitution. > once again legal precedence dictates this very important piece that > should have been legislated properly. Publishing a few pics of someone in a public place is not a violation. But publishing a series of photos of someone in various public places in order to build up a fake story is definetly a violation. The nature of technology will not change this. If one gets Kareenaesque in public one should expect the publicity. Curtailing the press to prevent such things is definetly a violation of freedom of the press and public. Of course i can't understand what's so interesting about watching some 2pence celebrity screwing themselves. -- rgds jtd -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
