--- JTD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > Publishing a few pics of someone in a public place is not a > violation. > But publishing a series of photos of someone in various public places > in order to build up a fake story is definetly a violation. <snip> Assuming that the act was committed in a public place. Is a pub a public place? I am asking. I dont know whats the technicality here. Does "right to admission reserved" make it a private place where right to privacy takes precedence over right to freedom of expression?
>Of course i can't understand > what's so interesting about watching some 2pence celebrity screwing > themselves. Lets see now, Cheap Thrills, Voyeurism, Cheap Thrills. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
