On Tuesday 26 September 2006 11:38, Chetan S wrote: > On 9/26/06, Dinesh Joshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 25 September 2006 06:18, Rony wrote: > > > The first flaming that the OP got was a personal attack, an > > > attempt to humiliate him, not a technical flaming. > > > > Exactly. I mean his post wasn't all that bad. > > Right. > M'be am missing the point here however,
U are. the point is not giving (or not giving info) but making the other person do his part of the job - First. > other than discussing mail > ettiquetes, flames and nitpicking, has anyone really gone around > throwing in few good ideas at all ? Whether the OP deserves it is > another point. However won't it be a good idea to just pitch in and > have a free flowing discussion on technical stuff ? U missed the identity and ciss thread?. There was the thread on fingerprint processing algos form Mukund Deshpande and myself, wanna start. Ther was the adhoc wireless network workshop at HBCSE.Like to poke around there. > Agreed that there's tons of material out there. However if you have > experience in anyone of them could anyone give the student a good > sizing/estimate ? I don't say give him a project ready, however > give him pointers and a rough estimate on how much time it would > take. That is what he has to do - the groundwork.It helps him accrure and (hopefully) assimilate info. Let some student do that and several on the list will provide more than adequate support. -- Rgds JTD -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
