On 10/12/06, Devdas Bhagat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/10/06 13:47 +0530, Faraz Shahbazker wrote:
> Try recreating the above scenario without glibc/binutils/coreutils (or
> any replacement thereof) and see what you get. Note that I've not even
Uhm, BSD? <confused>
Uhm "any replacement thereof"? ... clearly there seems to be a
language problem! Dunno where to go from here - so I guess I'll follow
your advice and take up more fruitful pursuits.
Anyway thanks for a good joust :-)
.farazs
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
