Hi! On 10/25/06, jtd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Asshole author who does not know the abc of what he is trying to pontificate about. The gplv3 prevents a distributor from preventing users excersing the rights guranteed under gplv2. It does not prevent the service provider from preventing use of his services if the user changes the default blob. where is the question of violating others copyrights. The gplv3 also explicitly prevents using of patents against any recipient of gplv3 code. If the crooks who use GNU feel otherwise they are welcome to spend a zillion in rolling their own stuff and see if their business survives.
You are just telling people that it's only our way. Take it or leave it. :-( And if someone does not agree to GPLv3 becomes crook! Thank you very much for all the freedom and software freedom propagated by FSF!
And btw forbes is yet another M$ schill. Similiar articles published in the past few yrs - including complete support for SCO (the author was dan lyons afair) - would fill a couple of pages.
Why the moment someone talks against FSF they become MS agents? :-)
Seems to me Vista is in line for another quarter delay.
Who care? If it's release tomorrow or after 10 Years!
Rgds JTD
I would suggest that we start respecting other peoples view, opinions and FREEDOM! With regards, -- --Dinesh Shah :-) -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
