On 26-Oct-06, at 7:46 PM, jtd wrote:
even i know that. I was talking about the importance of a license
being clear and simple. Which creative commons is and gpl v3 is
not.
You cant have a simple licence.
you can - if the license is evolved in the foss way - as all the
other licenses are evolving, and as far as i can see, getting more
and more like each other. As i said before comparing the non-
religious licenses to the GPL v3 is like comparing Linux to Hurd.
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Associate, NRC-FOSS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
