On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:29:55 +0530, Sachin G Nambiar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

> I understand that if the license allows it it's fine,but my
> contention is it's still free software even if it's not freely
> distributable, because i allow you (as a maker) to use it in anyway
> you wish to change it in anyway you wish and but don't give it away
> for free (as in beer) just because i allow you to do anything with
> it for your own use.

        In the context of free software, you can only call it free if
 it has the four cardinal freedoms as defined by the page titled the
 free software definition: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html

  * The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).
  * The freedom to study how the program works, and adapt it to your
    needs (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition
    for this.
  * The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor
    (freedom 2).
  * The freedom to improve the program, and release your
    improvements to the public, so that the whole community benefits
    (freedom 3). Access to the source code is a precondition for
    this.

        You are trying to restrict the fundamental freedoms 2 and 3;
 which makes it non-free software.

  Even wikipedia seems to be with me on this:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software_license
 says: "Free software is software which grants recipients the freedom
 to modify and redistribute the software.

        So, non-redistribution does not cut mustard.

        Oh, and the DFSG pretty much asks for re-distributability,
 which means so does the open soirce initiatives definition of free
 software. 

        You are talking about free software, a term that has pretty
 well established semantics associated with it.  While you might be
 free to make up your own meanings for words,  doing so is not really
 conducive to meaningful communication.

        manoj

-- 
The relative importance of files depends on their cost in terms of the
human effort needed to regenerate them.  -- T.A. Dolotta
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


-- 
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

Reply via email to