On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:23:25 +0530, jtd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Friday 19 January 2007 15:41, Harsh Busa wrote: >> can somebody compare eula from other linux based os vendors ?
> The licence says it all. Contrast the above > with this http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines I would like to draw attention to one distinction: the social contract governs Debian, and not the end users; Debian does not have an end user license agreement. The debian installer, and the cd's created, have a regular GPL license, but I doubt that can be called an EULA in the sense that SUSE/Red Hat impose on their end users. While I shan't get into the religious jihads of whose distro is bigger; I am compelled to note that Debian is a fundamentally different beastie when it comes to freedom issues (which may or may not be a good thing, depending on your perspective). manoj -- A person with one watch knows what time it is; a person with two watches is never sure. Proverb Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
