On 12-Feb-07, at 3:51 PM, Dhawal Doshy wrote:
ok - in hairsplitting legalistic terms I am being unreasonable,
but would warn any users that the lack of transparency here may
lead to problems tomorrow.
Agreed.. and if you do not get a satisfactory response and
commitment from openlx (preferably through a private communication)
then kindly enlighten the rest of us.. who then ought to give them
some nice *unwanted* publicity..
anyway a guy i know is downloading it right now, and if he doesnt get
the source we will take appropriate action
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Associate, NRC-FOSS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
